Blocking & Filtering Essay -- essays research papers

"Any content-based regulation of the Internet, no matter how benign the purpose, could throw a fit the global village to roast the pig."U.S. Supreme Court majority decision, Reno v. ACLU (June 26, 1997) Blocking and filtering software for the Internet is one of the most hotly debated topics regarding free speech and the Internet. many an(prenominal) have criticized blocking software for being both under and over inclusive, and others have argued that blocking software should not be used at every last(predicate) in public institutions such as libraries and schools. On the other side, supporters of blocking software claim that is a legitimate method to regulate access to " foreign" material on the Internet, especially access for minors. But, before we begin to look at these debates directly, we have to examine how the different types of blocking software available work. some all blocking software contains several features that enable the user to customize it for th eir particular preferences. Users can set the particular levels and/or categories they want the software to screen. So, for example, a user could instruct his browser to block all nudity and sex acts, but still allow sex education and intolerance, while another users could do the opposite. Another common feature is the ability to thaw particular web sites when they are blocked. So, if a user was attempting to access the CNN web site, and it was blocked because it contained, for example, the Starr report, the user could unblock it. A final common feature of most blocking software is that it can be turned on and off for particular users on a particular machine, so that parents can turn the software on when their children are using the computer, but allow themselves unlimited access. Blocking software works in several major ways blocking by word, blocking particular sites, blocking all sites except those on a "white list," and blocking by preset ratings.Most of the first block ing software worked by blocking words the software would scan web sites for certain, unacceptable words such as "breast" or "sex." This type of software was often ridiculed, because it is ridiculously over broad, for example blocking sites on breast cancer or news sites about(predicate) the President. In addition, this type of blocking has the disadvantage of not being able to scan pictures for unacceptable m... ...ts computers. Representative Bob Franks of New Jersey introduced a uniform bill in the House, dubbed the "Safe Schools Internet Act of 1999".In addition, the constitutionality of library filters has been, and continues to be, litigated in several cases. All cases decided to this point have declared needful filters on all library computers to be unconstitutional.Many argue that the PICS system is the best way to provide for parental empowerment in order to draw off their childrens internet use. These people point out that, at least for now, the PICS system is voluntary and that third parties can rate sites. The rating systems used in concurrency with PICS establish a uniform standard that parents can rely on, instead of the opinions of software companies list makers. The purpose behind Internet filters is to provide parents, educators and other with an strong tool to protect minors from harmful material through their computers. At first blush they appear to be a simple technological place to the problem of indecency on the Internet. However, this simple solution has touched off a firestorm of controversy, which show no signs of cooling off in the near future.