Whether Einstein Was a Plagiarist or Not :: Plagiarism Albert Einstein Scientists Essays

Whether champion Was a Plagiarist or NotProp unmatchablents of mavin have acted in a way that appears to foul the historical record. Albert Einstein (1879-1955), Time Magazines Person of the Century, wrote a yearn treatise on special relativity theory (it was actually called On the Electrodynamics of travel Bodies, 1905a), without listing any references. Many of the key ideas it presented were known to Lorentz (for example, the Lorentz transformation) and Poincar before Einstein wrote the famous 1905 paper.As was typical of Einstein, he did not discover theories he merely commandeered them. He took an existing body of experience, picked and chose the ideas he liked, then wove them into a tale roughly his contribution to special relativity. This was done with the full knowledge and consent of many of his peers, such as the editors at Annalen der Physik.The most recognisable par of all time is E = mc2. It is attributed by convention to be the sole province of Albert Einstein ( 1905). However, the conversion of matter into vigor and energy into matter was known to Sir Isaac Newton (Gross bodies and light are standardised into one another..., 1704). The equation move be attributed to S. Tolver Preston (1875), to Jules Henri Poincar (1900 according to Brown, 1967) and to Olinto De Pretto (1904) before Einstein. Since Einstein never correctly derived E = mc2 (Ives, 1952), there appears nothing to connect the equation with anything original by Einstein.Arthur Eddingtons selective presentation of data from the 1919 Eclipse so that it supposedly supported Einsteins general relativity theory is surely one of the biggest scientific hoaxes of the 20th century. His lavish support of Einstein corrupted the bank line of history. Eddington was less interested in testing a theory than he was in crowning Einstein the king of science.The physics community, unwittingly perhaps, has busy in a kind of fraud and silent conspiracy this is the by-product of simply being b ystanders as the hyperinflation of Einsteins record and reputation took place. This silence benefited anyone livelihood Einstein.IntroductionScience, by its very nature, is insular. In general, chemists read and write about chemistry, biologists read and write about biology, and physicists read and write about physics. tho they may all be competing for the same research dollar (in its broadest sense). Thus, if scientists wanted more money for themselves, they might decide to compete unfairly. The way they can do this is convince the funding agencies that they are more important than any other branch of science.