Family Heritage In Everyday Use Essay -- Everyday Use Alice Walker Ess

Family Heritage In terrene UseIn Alice Walkers Everyday Use, the message approximately the preservation of heritage, specifically Afro-American heritage, is very dismiss. It is writ large that Walker believes that a persons heritage should be a living, dynamic vocalisation of the culture from which it arose and not a frozen timepiece just to be observed from a distance. There be two main approaches to heritage preservation depicted by the characters in this story. The narrator, a middle-aged Afro-American woman, and her youngest daughter Maggie, be in agreement with Walker. To them, their family heritage is everything around them that is twisting in their everyday lives and everything that was involved in the lives of their ancestors. To Dee, the narrators oldest daughter, heritage is the past - something to mold or hang on the ring, a mere artistic, aesthetic monitor of her family history. Walker depicts Dees view of family heritage as being one of amazement and lack of understanding. The differences in attitude that Dee and Maggie portray about their heritage are seen early in the story. When the familys house burned down ten or twelve years ago, Maggie was deeply affected by the tragedy of losing her office where she grew up. As her mother describes, She has been like this, chin on chest, eyes on terms, feet in shuffle, ever since the fire that burned the other house to the ground (409). Dee, on the other hand, had hated the house. Her mother had wanted to ask her, wherefore dont you dance around the ashes? (409). Dee did not assert any significance in the home where she had grown up. In her confusion about her heritage, it was just a house to her. Another example of Dees confusion about her own African-American heritage is expressed when she announces to her mother and sister that she has changed her name to Wangero Leewanika Kemanjo. When her mother questions her about the change, Dee says, I couldnt bear it any longer being named after the large number who oppress me (411). According to her mother, the name has been in the family since before the Civil state of war and most likely represents family unity to her. However, Dee does not realize that. Apparently, she believes that by changing her name she is expressing solidarity with her African ancestors and rejecting the oppression implied by the taking on of American names by black slaves.Commenting ... ...tage (413). That comment is somewhat ironic since it appears to be Dee who does not understand what family heritage is all about. Walkers view is very clear at the end of the story. By Dee wanting to hang the family heirloom on the wall to look at from a distance, she is alienating herself from her family heritage. That is exactly what Walker thinks is the ill-timed thing to do. Walker would prefer the quilts to be used and integrated into mundane life, like Maggie and her mother prefer. The same idea applies to all of the other mansion items that Dee ha s her eye on the churn top, the dasher, and the benches for the table that her daddy made. They all are a part of life for Maggie and her mother. Walker believes that the only value that they hold for Dee is that they would be good trinkets to show off in her house. By victimisation the quilts in this symbolic way, Walker is making the point that family heirlooms can only have meaning if they remain connected to the culture they sprang from - in essence, to be put to Everyday Use. Works CitedWalker, Alice. Everyday Use. Robert DiYanni, ed. Literature Reading Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. sixth ed. Boston McGraw-Hill, 2007.